‘Dasuki didn’t steal $2.1bn’: Nigerians react
There are two sides to the story now.
Some people say he (Dasuki) stole the whole money; some are saying he
didn’t steal the money. Between the two of them, let them sort
themselves out. People take things out of context. The allegation
against him (Dasuki) was that he stole $2.1bn. But he (Jonathan) said
that’s not possible because out of this money, he bought a lot of
equipment for the Army and Navy. That was what he was saying, not
necessarily that he did not steal any money, but it wasn’t possible for
him to have stolen (misappropriated) the whole money, which was
budgeted for arms because, according to him (Jonathan), the man bought a
lot of ammunition and equipment for the Army, Navy and Air Force out of
the money. That was the context in which I understand him. It is those
who made allegations (about the arms funds being shared to individuals)
that have to justify it. If someone says people have stolen, then it
behoves such a person to prove it. I don’t think there is any
controversy about this. I think this is a non-issue. We shouldn’t
generate any controversy out of that. Since he is standing trial, they
should prosecute him properly, so he will account for the money.
When the government of the day, which
has the instrumentality of propaganda and security agencies, accuses you
of anything, even God will find it difficult to save you from that
situation. Knowing the nature of Nigerian politics, it is not impossible
that certain allegations might have been grossly and politically
exaggerated. That being said, the statement coming from Jonathan is not
mature enough. For me, it is not time to talk. He should have waited for
six months for Nigerians to demystify the current government before he
started talking. But it is normal. He is human; nobody is perfect.
Secondly, the way the current government is going about its
anti-corruption crusade is nothing but a charade. The attention has
been on individuals defrauding the state. But the President has not
addressed the problem of the state, upon which he presides, defrauding
the citizens. A good example is electricity. In Nigeria, you don’t get
power, you pay for darkness. This is the state defrauding the citizens.
And if you go by what we call in behavioural science the principle of
behavioural determinism, what you learn from the society is what you
give back to society. This government is fighting corruption on the
pages of newspapers. It is highly political; it is propaganda; it is not
sincere. The Nigerian people have been found guilty of defrauding the
state, but the state, presided over by President Buhari, keeps
defrauding Nigerians through power, water corporation, customs,
immigrations, ministries, departments and agencies.
First of all, the claim against Sambo
Dasuki by his accusers was that he had mismanaged or embezzled over $2bn
and now the counterclaim by Jonathan, to a large extent, exonerates or
sheds light on the whole controversy. Now, what is needed is that there
is nothing wrong in inviting Jonathan to come and broaden his submission
formally as regards this very issue. If he has said Dasuki has not
embezzled the money, I think it will be wrong for him to simply say it
in a seminar or conference, but he should say it where it matters. That
will help in the prosecution of this very case.
I am at a loss as to how the former
President, after all the revelations about Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.)
till date, still doubts the visible corrupt tendencies (of his
government). I am still at a loss with the ex-President’s statement,
especially with the trial of Dasuki, which is ongoing. I am at a loss
that the ex-President would be denying this (diversion of arms funds).
We should remember that the former President doubted the fact that the
Chibok girls were kidnapped. His statements still surprise me. We
expected that the former President would have acted like a statesman to
accept the act of corruption. I don’t know if he (Jonathan) read what
the former Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, actually said; that
the money she approved for Dasuki was authorised by him (Jonathan). I
think it is high time we advised that Jonathan should be interrogated.
He is not above the law. Since he is now saying Dasuki didn’t steal, I
think he should be quizzed.
Clearly, some part of the money was used
for (election) campaigns. There is no doubt about that. If they bought
aircraft, warships, weapons for the Army, etc, it doesn’t mean that the
whole $2.1bn was used for that purpose. I believe that part of it was
used for politics. I don’t know why the (former) President had to make a
statement on this because it raises questions as to whether settlements
had been reached.
The money was brought out and used for
buying heavy equipment; the money was also used for political purposes —
campaign purposes. I think that is my understanding of this. He knows
about the $2.1bn; he has claimed knowledge of it. He is talking about
what it was used for, but he didn’t mention the issue of using it for
party politics. So, I don’t know what to add, since he himself
volunteered the statement.
I have great respect for the Office of
the President of Nigeria; be it ex-President Goodluck Jonathan or the
incumbent President Muhammadu Buhari. Whoever is elected as our leader,
it is our responsibility to honour and respect such a person.
However, my position is that this is not
just about stealing or corruption, but misappropriation of funds. If a
certain amount of money has been budgeted for security purposes, nobody
has the right to reallocate such funds for purchase of rams, goats,
public relations and distribution across party lines for electioneering
purposes. At the end of the day, it may not even be $2.1bn. One will
expect ex-President Jonathan to give Dansuki a clean bill of health that
not even a kobo has been misappropriated or stolen. Even if it is $1 or
$10 that has been misapplied, the statement credited to Jonathan is
‘unpresidential’.
For the sake of clarity, the former
President has not said emphatically that Sambo Dasuki did not steal
money. He has also not said that Dasuki stole money. What he said was
that it was not possible that Dasuki would have stolen $2.1bn. Jonathan
let us know that part of the arms funds was used to buy aircraft,
warships and these arms were delivered to the present government.
What Jonathan said at that event was
true. He didn’t say that there was no corruption in his government.
President Muhammadu Buhari cannot claim that there is no corruption even
in his government. We have heard of diversion of IDP funds in this
government. The Chief of Army Staff, Tukur Buratai, has also been
accused of illegally acquiring properties in Dubai. What have they done
about these? This government is a government of blackmail and they don’t
want people to see anything good in Jonathan. If there was any money
lost, it cannot possibly be up to $2.1bn. With the achievements of
Jonathan, it is unfortunate that he could be labelled as corrupt. There
is nothing special that Buhari is doing that Jonathan did not do.
Jonathan also fought corruption in his government. What is going on is
noisemaking, not fighting corruption. If they are really serious, they
should probe former governor Babatunde Fashola and the Minister of
Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi.
It is obvious that our past leaders are
very insensitive to the plight and sufferings of Nigerians. How can a
former President, who presided over the looting of Nigeria, have the
guts to defend one of his aides who has not denied stealing the money?
Dansuki didn’t say he didn’t get the money, he only explained how he
distributed it. Jonathan owes Nigerians an apology for saying that.
Secondly, what makes the statement more
irresponsible is that the case is still pending in court. Is the former
President saying he wants to take over the role of the judiciary? Is he
concluding before the court delivers its judgment?
Comments