Why EFCC may not go after Jonathan, Obasanjo, Babangida
More revelations have emerged from the newly launched authorised biography of President Muhammadu Buhari, titled "Buhari: The Challenges of Leadership in Nigeria."
The book, written by Professor John Paden, revealed that Buhari is in possession of implicating letters written by former President Goodluck Jonathan.
Jonathan, in the letter, was said to have requested "off-budget funds" - funds not included in the Federal Government budget.

According to Paden, the
purpose of Buhari's anti-corruption war is not to jail former top
government officials but to retrieve the stolen funds.
He
said if the Economic Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) goes after
Jonathan or other former Presidents, or military leaders, the stability
of Nigeria's political system would be at stake.
Paden,
however, said such former leaders, in exchange for immunity, could help
the government identify patterns and sources of corruption.
This is believed to be the reason the EFCC has not gone after Jonathan and other former leaders yet.
The anti-graft agency has, since the anti-corruption
war took off, limited its drag net to the possible beneficiaries of
looted funds - PDP Chieftains and other top officials who served under
Jonathan.
The author wrote: "The fact that
Buhari was enlisting the help of the international community in the
probes lent weight to the seriousness of his effort – and also meant
that alleged offenders had nowhere to hide.
"Would
the trail lead to former President Jonathan himself? As of the early
months of 2016, it appeared that the EFCC was not going after Jonathan.
Nor was it going after former President Obasanjo.
"The question of the stability of the entire political system seemed at stake.
"In
addition, a number of senior military officers, who had served as Heads
of State – from Babangida to Abubakar – seemed off-limits.
"Indeed,
rumours swirled that if the probes went after senior officers, they
might push back because they had extensive networks in the active
military services.
"At the same time, the
knowledge such heavyweights possessed could well be traded for immunity
and would help to illuminate the patterns and sources of corruption.
"Buhari
had letters in his possession showing Jonathan’s requests for
off-budget funds. But Buhari’s larger purpose was not to put former
high-level officials in jail.
"Rather, it was to retrieve stolen funds and to change the political culture of the country."
On
the 2016 budget padding scandal, the book revealed that a total of 184
civil servants were penalised for their different roles in the padding,
while 22 top officials among the number were dismissed from service.
Comments